WordPress Stats: Growing Tobacco Plants: The 50 Year Report

WordPress stats count numbers of visits to the blog. But, on the freeby blogs, they do not identify ‘unique’ visitors. Thus, 100 views could be all from the same person. A useful addition to WordPress in the recent past has been the ‘world distribution’ of visits. But, in order to actually see some evidence of ‘uniqueness’, you have to be lucky enough to look at your stats at just the right moment.

Tonight (or rather, this morning – 2am) has been such a moment. Naturally, at 2am, UK visits are quiet, but it is the time when our US friends are becoming alert. Tonight, however, has been a bit odd. Only 14 visits have been recorded. The interesting thing, however, is the distribution of the visits around the world and the reason for the visits. Here are the facts:

Origin of visits

Belgium………………………………7.

USA……………………………………4.

Canada……………………………….1.

Jamaica………………………………1.

Serbia………………………………..1.

The numbers are small, but the point of interest is the origins. Note especially that there have been none from the UK.

It becomes interesting when you look at the posts which have been accessed. Sometimes, it is difficult to know what people have been looking at, but, just at this moment, it is clear. The posts viewed have been:

Growing, Curing..etc…tobacco for cigs…………11.

Aussie court case (plain packs 15th Aug)……….1.

TobCon desperate? (recent)…………………………1.

Baccy curing 3rd Nov………………………………….1.

Without going into paroxisms of statistical mumbo-jumbo about percentages, it is pretty clear that my essay about’ Growing, Curing….Tobacco’ has worldwide interest (although not much!). One also needs to couple the above little bit of info with the fact that the origin of visits to this blog have come from many, many different countries all over the world over the last several months. Even though we are talking about very, very, very small numbers, patterns can be distinguished. For example, hardly any visits at all have come from Africa (including North Africa – Egypt, Morroco, Lybia, etc) or Russia and the Far East.

Over the past few months, that particular post about growing tobacco has been hit over 4,000 times, world-wide. Compared with the hits on celeb sites, it is nothing – but it is indicative of the world-wide desire for an end to the ‘ethnic cleansing’ of PETS (People who Enjoy Tobacco).

——————–

I am going to refine that ESSAY somewhat. Somehow, I must emphasise the difference between characteristics of home-grown tobacco and commercial stuff. My very limited knowledge, at the moment, is that the difference, for me, as a smoker, is that my home-grown is rather more ‘intense’. I do not know a better word. When smoked on its own, it overwhelms the senses. Mixed with commercial stuff, the effect is mitigated, but it is extremely pleasant. But it smells more. (Heaven help the ‘stinkers!).

The end of the growing season is nigh (should have been already complete had it not been for the adverse weather!). But there are still one or two important questions which need answers regarding FERMENTATION. Fermentation is critical to the taste of tobacco. Fermentation produces the sweetness. Large scale producers can build huge sheds in which to process leaves. We little growers cannot replicate their methods on a small scale. The control of humidity, temperature and ventilation is too difficult. Therefore, the best thing for us to do, is to not expect a standardised product! Our home produce does not have to look like commercial stuff.

————————

This year, I have managed to produce quite a lot of stuff, But only about a third of what I expected due to the weather and slugs. I am already gearing up for next year.

The funny thing is that I have no financial need to do so! It is the people who are poor that need to do so! And it is these people, who smoke little, who can most benefit financially from growing their own. If a person smokes only ten cigs per week, that person is one who can gain most by growing tobacco plants since VOLUME is not important. Maybe five plants will be sufficient – and these plants can be grown indoors.

Tobacco plants will grow indoors. I have three that prove it. But…they are very weak, small, stunted…. whatever word that you wish to use. Next year, I shall experiment further. My plan is to grow plants indoors and use a fan to blow air over the surface of the leaves. But that is another scientific story….

———————-

Finally, tonight, I have started on the 50 year report by Doll et al on the Doctors Study. My vague, overall impression is of hopelessness. After fifty years of observations, nothing much emerges other than everyone dies sooner or later.

Doll, somehow, created a definition of ‘middle age’ as ‘up to 69 years’. Erm… since, for decades, people have retired at 65, Doll’s definition of ‘middle age’ can only be a fictional construct. The reality, for scientific purposes, is that there is no such thing as ‘middle age’. Nor is there any such thing as ‘old age’. These terms are too vague. It is surprising that a person who described himself as a ‘scientist’ could even think about terms such as ‘middle age’.

———————-

Having started upon the 50 year report, I shall explain it as best I can. Thus, I shall have created a permanent record, as best I can, of the evidence that statistics proves that smoking is harmless UNLESS specific persons have some specific propensity which indicates that they should not smoke; nor should such people drink alcohol; nor should such people eat. But they can become politicians and enjoy not tobacco, not alcohol, not fattening foods – but persecuting others. WOW! How gratifying can it get!

 

 

12 Responses to “WordPress Stats: Growing Tobacco Plants: The 50 Year Report”

  1. acetylcholine rocks! Says:

    Interesting that our Belgian neighbours are looking for info on home grown. That kinda backs up my belief that their formerly sweet tasting tobacco has been nobbled by the EU Nazi eugenicist bastids.

    My greenhouse plants are doing quite well, Junican, I’ll snap a few pics when the old weather bucks up a bit.

    • junican Says:

      I’m very pleased to hear about your plants. Let me know when you have pics. I am always interested in how well plants grow in indoor environments (which includes greenhouses). I want to know why indoor plants do not gain the size that outdoor plants do.

      • acetylcholine rocks! Says:

        Most of these grew as nature intended, beginning from seeds left in the soil from last years crop. As a result, they were later than those I had started indoors for this years crop, and were quite small when the weather turned cold, so I transplanted them to the greenhouse.

        I also took about 18 cuttings from this years crop, of which only six rooted, and only a couple are actually gaining in size, not very scientifically done, but at least I know it works!

        Next time I will do it a bit more professionally using rooting hormone and a warming mat.



      • acetylcholine rocks! Says:

        Not sure if the links have shown up, so here is the link to a slideshow:

        http://img194.imageshack.us/slideshow/player.php?id=img194/739/1354112351ge5.smil

  2. junican Says:

    I’ve looked at your slideshow. The leaves are rather small, but there are plenty of them.
    I haven’t heard of the idea of using cuttings. Worth experimenting with, I suppose. If you get good plants, why not?

    • acetylcholine rocks! Says:

      The leaves are narrower, probably due to the shorter (flowering) photoperiod, and the growth is less vigorous than it was a few weeks ago, probably a combination of the lower temperatures, lower intensity light and restricted ventilation.

      Still, it was an unplanned exercise, which will hopefully yield me a few more ounces of free snout, to get me through the winter, which is the main thing, lol.

  3. garyk30 Says:

    Just a thought.
    When you ‘cure’ tobacco, some very interesting things seem to happen to the leaves.

    Not only in the color; but, also the chemical structure.

    Do you know, are there changes to the nicotine content?

  4. junican Says:

    I’ve checked this out before. It seems that nicotine is an alkaloid. It is created by the plant in its leaves. It may be dependent upon photosynthesis to some extent. As I understand it, the nicotine is ‘locked into’ the leaves. Although nicotine is water soluble, it will not come out of the leaves just by being in water. The extraction of nicotine is more complicated than that.
    From my reading, I understand that the nicotine is concentrated more in the higher leaves of a plant, whereas starches (and thus sugars) are more concentrated in the middle leaves. But I suspect that there is not much difference, really! After all, nicotine is only 2% of the leaves.
    But, to be honest, I do not really know!

    • junican Says:

      Further, as I understand it, the purpose of fermenting (curing) tobacco is to turn starches into sugars in order to sweeten the taste. As we know, other flavours can be added. I tried just drying a green leaf and smoking it, but it tasted foul – harsh and bitter.

      • acetylcholine rocks! Says:

        From what I have gleaned off the web, the ammonia produced during fermentation and curing acts as an adjuvant and makes the nicotine more available to the smoker. Without it, the nicotine delivery would not be sufficient enough to be satisfying.

        Commercial tobacco contains stem and stalk in the form of ‘recon sheet’ with extra ammonia added to boost the nicotine delivery; because stem and stalk has a much lower nicotine content than leaf.

        This could be why commercial is less ‘intense’, as junican so aptly describes it, than our stuff., it also produces less tar.

  5. junican Says:

    So the excess ammonia released by the leaves is infused into stem stuff. Sounds llike a good, industrial process to me. So if I ferment my leaves in the presence of the stem stuff, then the stem stuff will absorb some of the released ammonia. GREAT!

    • acetylcholine rocks! Says:

      No doubt some manufacturers try to use naturally occurring ammonia, but I think Marlboro adds DAP, diammonium phosphate, to the recon sheet. This DAP is also used by the wine and beer making fraternity so is probably non toxic.

      Definitely something that warrants a closer look, if one wants to produce a similar grade to commercial tobacco, rather than the ‘peace-pipe’ tobacco we have now.

Comments are closed.