I was not intending to post tonight since my daughters have lauded their father with a splendid banquet and nice pressies. But I cannot resist. I hope that this post will be short.
It concerns what will happen after the referendum if the vote is ‘Leave’.
Leave the EU? What is the ‘EU’? I doubt that most ordinary people, including most politicians, know what ‘THE EU’ is. I don’t. The letters ‘EU’ stand for ‘European Union’, but have those words ever been defined? What do they mean? What does the phrase ‘UNITED States of America’ mean? What did the phrase ‘UNION of Soviet Socialist Republics’ mean?
History has taught us that such UNIONS are artificial. They are Empires, in reality. Who is the Emperor of the USA? Who is the Emperor of the European Union?
What is different in today’s world is that, generally, despite fraud, Emperors are voted into office by the People rather than by the Elite or by conquest.
We really ought to wake up. ALL Governments, since time immemorial, have needed an Emperor (King, Prime Minister, President, Secretary, Chairman, whatever).
But the EU is different. The real ‘Emperor’ is not known and not visible. ‘Emperors’ are just Spokespersons. The real power is elsewhere.
That is what is so frightening, and why we should get out. And that is why the People of Europe are rebelling. The real power lies in the UN, the WHO, the IPCC, but most people do not know that.
There are all sorts of weird things. For example, by what right does the International Monetary Fund comment on Brexit?
Questions need to be asked about the nature of the IMF – what it is for and how political it is. Does anyone have any idea what the IMF does? I don’t. I read somewhere that it gets grants from the USA which it spends upon its salaries and gives a bit of what’s left to some dictator or other. What has it got to do with the UK? Who cares what its over-paid academic boss thinks? Let her base her organisation in Nigeria, Ethiopia or Somalia, and then let us consider her worth.
Is that not very true? Is it not very true that the UN, WHO, FCTC, IPCC, etc, are ALL based in the healthy, wealthy West. Not a single one of them are based in, say, Sierra Leon. Not one. But would it not be better for all these wealth creating organisations were based in countries where they could employ people who needed work?
When did Cameron, or Corbin, say that they insist that those organisations should be based in third world countries?
They are hypocrites.
When Cancer Research UK (CRUK) relocates its Head Office to ‘The Ivory Coast’, or wherever, THEN I might possibly send it £2. And the same goes for Oxfam etc. When they relocate to where the efforts and our money are needed, THEN I might believe them.
In fact, our Government should be forcing them to relocate so that employment in that charity is native, and not healthy, wealthy West.
When will the idiocy end? I have a friend who is active in caring for homeless people. She works for nothing and is very kind. We give her surplus groceries from time to time. Our ‘charity’ is as nothing compared to the great needs of such people, but it helps a little.
‘Charity Begins At Home’, but I do not know what that means. In so far as a Charity has unpaid volunteers in the UK who, literally, distribute food and arrange shelter for the unfortunate and homeless, then it is worthy of my contributions.
But Oxfam etc have become leaches. They make no sense. They live in the UK and drain contributions to support themselves in the UK. Maybe Government should only support them if they live in the countries which they claim to be helping.
The UK Taxpayer has been funding ‘The Charity’, known as the EU, to the tune of £6,000,000,000 per an. What has the EU ‘Charity’ been doing with that money? Why is that ‘Charity’ based in the most comfortable of places? Why is its Headquarters not placed in the Outer Hebrides?
We can thus see that Cameron et al have no understanding of reality. They live in a comfortable zone and they create their own reality within that zone. Thus, the idea that the Houses of Parliament could be relocated to the Outer Hebrides is incomprehensible to them. And, of course, they are right. That idea is stupid. I mention that idea only to illustrate extremes.
In my opinion, there is only one question in the Brexit debate, and that is the Sovereignty of the British People. It cannot be shared or transferred. It is absolute. In so far as successive ‘progressive’ governments have failed to understand that European wars have not, to my knowledge, been caused by the UK, then the UK has no shame. Other nations in Europe have the shame. That shame is the killings and mutilations of untold numbers of plebs.
We must exit the EU because it was always based upon a false premise. The False Premise was that it was THE PEOPLE of Europe who wanted to go to war with each other. It was always the Emperors who wanted wars. The EU has itself become an Emperor, who wants to wage war – in The Ukraine, for example.
At home, we see more and more examples of cruelty inflicted upon the vulnerable – the smoking ban in jails and lunatic asylums. It is unlikely that such cruelty will cease at smoking bans. As long as we cannot sack legislators, then we cannot repeal bad laws.
That is the most important thing.