I could not resist that heading.
The virtue of ‘The Donald’ is that he has galvanised politics in the USA. He has used plain language, using words and phrases which mean specific things, and not the language which USA career politicians use to obfuscate reality. “We must all be together” in career political speak has become “All genuine Americans must be together” in Trump speak.
We suffer inordinately from ‘Political Speak’. For example, in Cameron speak, the word ‘Muslim’ means peace and order, whereas in ‘Reality Speak’, it means war and division. But that sentence is a generalisation. The reality is that almost all Muslims go about their normal lives as best they can. Only a minority are crazy. But that crazy minority is the problem, and it is that crazy minority which “UN-ENGLISH”. The horrible thing is that it is not possible to return that crazy minority to their place of origin. That ideology is what needs to be overturned. There is no EU Justice which can dictate that the UK must suffer the enormous cost of policing crazy people who should never have been allowed into the UK. They should be returned to the ‘authorities’ in their place of origin. And so should their families. ‘Human Rights’ does not mean a ‘right’ to displace indigenous people from their employment and homes, or for such people to be fed, clothed, housed, medicated, etc, at the cost of the indigenous people.
In the same way that ‘The Donald’ has revitalised politics in the USA, we in the UK need a political revolution. Who decided and allowed Cameron to become the Tory leader candidate? Who were the people who decided that he was the person? His speech at the Tory convention was too perfect for him not to have known, well in advance, that he was ‘the one’. Who decided that he was ‘the one’? To what extent is he beholden to those shadows who decided that he should be ‘the one’?
We do not know, even though it is obvious that those deciders must exist.
It is because those deciders exist in the background and in the shadows, that the Zealots can get away with stealing taxpayers’ contributions. Let me put it this way: University Professors’ and Doctors’ salaries are paid by student debt. They are paid to teach. Who pays them to shout about sugar and tobacco? Further, do they use their own time to dictate, or do they use student-paid time?
The recent Gov statement that taxpayer funding must not be used to lobby has more consequences than we see at first sight. It also means that taxpayers’ money must not be used to produce the statistics needed to support the lobbying. I suspect that that is the reason for the hysterics from the leaches. They have been dis-empowered.
‘Trumping the Health Zealots’ requires plain speaking. The Zealots must not be allowed to dictate the terms of the debate. For example, it is a well-known fact that the timescale for harm from SHS is way beyond the normal life-expectancy of humans. The Doctors Study and the Hospital Study, and all the other studies, have shown that to be true.
The basis for smoking bans is false, and the promoters of such bans knew that the basis was false.
It is only a matter of time before the Zealots are ‘trumped’.