Further about the IPCC and the FCTC

I’m a bit surprised that no one took up my suggestion to watch the videos here:

http://niklowe.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/musical-interlude-with-touch-of-climate.html

They are good stuff since they show that the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change’ (IPCC) is a political and bureaucratic organisation and not a scientific one, and that ‘scientific papers’ are anything but, and that the reports of the IPCC are ‘fixed’. In other words, the IPCC is a fraud.

It makes sense to believe that the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (the FCTC) was also fixed and is a fraud. In fact, the fact that The Public and The Press were excluded from the shindig in Moscow shows with little doubt that that ‘conference’ was little more than window-dressing; that it was a gang of bureaucrats agreeing to whatever the leadership said. Thus, the conference followed WHO demands from its ‘partners’, the Drugs Companies, to condemn  ecigs. That is what happened. It is a lot like the Fuhrer deciding and receiving acclamation at a public assembly in the 1930s. There is no significant difference. The ‘assemblies’ are set up and dissent is excluded so that only the demands of the executive bureaucrats are heard, and the assembled people acclaim. Their jobs depend upon it. I think that Saddam Hussein’s ‘assemblies’ were organised on the same lines. Applaud hysterically or be taken out and shot.

=====

The precise purpose of ‘Democracy’ is to protect The People from such despotism. That what Democracy is for. Thus, for example, the word “Marriage” is sacrosanct. It means the union of A MAN AND A WOMAN. It does not mean the union of a man and a man, or a woman and a woman, or any combination of any number of such individuals, and their dogs. But, my statement does not exclude people from entering into agreements among themselves if they wish to. But do not call those agreements ‘marriage’.

The purpose of Democracy is not to have the demands of the majority complied with. In fact, the opposite is true. Its purpose is to elect individuals to:

a) stop the Bureaucrats (aka, the Aristocrats) from pleasing themselves, and

b) ensure that minorities are not persecuted, and

c) ensure that everyone is treated fairly as a human being.

=====

From the above, we see that it is the DUTY of elected representatives to protect individuals from persecution. That is their DUTY. That is what the are elected for. It is no part of their DUTY, or even ‘a good thing’, for them to espouse some course of action like banning smoking in pubs. That is no what they are for. They are there to oppose the demands of the Aristocrats, including Health Aristocrats.

We have given very little attention to the rise of the Health Aristocracy. I would not go so far as to suggest that certain Health Aristocrats should meet Madame Guillotine, but I am tempted.

In the meantime, there is no doubt that the servants of these Aristocrats continue to harass smokers in every way that they can. Why do they do so? 

It is all so artificial.